The Singer Solution To World Poverty - The New York Times.
The Singer Solution to World Poverty In Peter Singer’s article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Singer suggests that Americans should donate all of the money they are spending on luxuries, not necessities, to the world’s poor.His argument seems simple and straight forward, but there are several unanswered questions.What is the cause of world poverty?
The article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” by author Peter Singer attempts to provide a workable solution to the world poverty problem. Singer proposes that the problem of poverty can be solved if each person in the developed world gave away some of the excess money that they have.
The New York Time magazine in its September 5, 1999 issue published an article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” by Peter Singer. The article outlined a plan addressing global poverty problems.
In his essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” (1999), originally published in the New York Times, Australian philosopher Peter Singer argues that Americans are obligated to make charity a necessary financial burden. Arguing loosely for a “one-fifth rule,” meaning that an individual should allocate one-fifth of his income to charity, it uses a combination of qualitative and.
In his essay, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, the author Peter Singer wrote a few hypothetical examples to prove his moral judgments, in which he tried to persuade the readers to give away all the money one spends on luxuries via the example of Bob, a man who spared the innocent kids life trying to save his valuable Bugatti.
The Solution For World Poverty By Peter Singer. In Peter Singer’s essay, “The Solution to World Poverty”, he attempts to convince the audience, through hypothetical examples and his philosophical background, that much more could be done by individuals to end world poverty.
Singer believes that we have an obligation to prevent misfortunes such as, starvation or poverty, from occurring so long as it doesn’t require us to sacrifice something equally as important. To reiterate, Singer’s main argument is, “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything morally significant, we ought, morally, to do it.